LFC Comments: Thanks to Joan River for sending us this article:
https://www.notonthebeeb.co.uk/post/what-is-really-in-the-c19-vaccines
Mark Playne
6 days ago
VACCINE INGREDIENTS REVEALED
Updated: a day ago
A new report has just been released by The Scientists Club collating research on the real contents of the C19 ‘vaccines’.
This article features a few highlights – to read the full report please download the PDF at the end.
NB – In anticipation of the many emails I will get asking about The Scientists Club yes, they are keeping their identities quiet for now.
I understand the frustration, but the gravity of the overall situation needs to be understood.
In 1920s New York, would someone spilling incriminating evidence about Al Capone, have given their name, photo and home address to a newspaper?
Or, would they have required anonymity?
Options were to publish without names or, withhold the content.
As you can see, I chose the former, and hope you can appreciate the situation. 😁
Here are some of the highlights from the report….
Introduction
The Covid-Sars2 pandemic induced industries to develop new drugs that they called vaccines.
The mechanism of action of these drugs (as declared by the pharmaceutical industries coupled with what is reported in the products’ data sheet) is clearly proves these products are not vaccines, but nanotechnological drugs working as a genetic therapy.
The ‘vaccines’ have been labelled vaccines to circumnavigate rules on basic ‘medicines’ which are in place for all drugs most especially novel experimental biotech.
The ‘vaccines’ are patented and the real ingredients held secret from the public and government buyers using taxpayers money.
Consumers are kept in the dark from the nanotechnological processes involved, the side effects and from the possible nano-bio-interactions that can happen.
By analysis with nano-tech instruments, this study provides information on the real content.
Materials and methods Four “vaccines” were analyzed developed for Corona Virus disease (Comirnaty di Pfizer-BioNtech, Vaxzevria by Astrazeneca, Janssen by Johnson & Johnson), Moderna) using different instrumentation and protocols of preparation according to new nanotechnological approaches.
Optical Microscope, Dark-Field Microscope, UV absorbance and fluorescence spectroscope, Scanning Electron Microscopes, Transmission Electron Microscope, Energy Dispersive Spectroscope, X-ray Diffractometer, Nuclear Magnetic Resonance instruments were used to verify the “vaccines”’ morphologies and contents. For the high-technology measurements and the care of the investigation, all the controls were activated and reference measurements adopted in order to obtain validated results.
ANALYSIS: Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope coupled with an x-ray microprobe of an Energy Dispersive System
MODERNA
- A mixed entity (organic-inorganic) identified in a Moderna “vaccine”. It is a Carbon-based substrate where some nanoparticles are embedded. The nanoparticles are composed of Aluminium-Copper-Iron-Chlorine.
- Many foreign bodies were identified with a spherical morphology with some bubble-shaped cavities. They are composed of Silicon- Lead-Cadmium-Selenium. This highly-toxic composition reminds that of quantum dots (Cadmium selenide).
- A 100-micron entity that reminds that of graphene. It is composed of Carbon and Oxygen with contamination of Nitrogen, Silicon, Phosphorus, Chlorine.
- Carbon-based entities in a Moderna “vaccine” (see below) mixed with aggregates filled with Aluminium-silicate particles
PFIZER
- Sharp debris of 20micron of length identified in a Pfizer “vaccine”. It is composed of Carbon, Oxygen Chromium, Sulphur, Aluminium, Chloride, Nitrogen.
- A strange foreign body, surely engineered with strange holes on the surface. The white debris are composed of Carbon, Oxygen, Aluminium, Silicon, Calcium, Magnesium, Chlorine and Nitrogen.
- Debris identified in a Pfizer “vaccine”. The white 2-micron-long particle is composed of Bismuth, Carbon, Oxygen, Aluminium, Sodium, Copper, Nitrogen.
- An organic (Carbon-Oxygen-Nitrogen) aggregate with embedded nanoparticles of Bismuth-Titanium-Vanadium -Iron-Copper Silicon-Aluminium embedded in Pfizer “vaccine”
- The 50-micron long body (see image below) is a mysterious presence in a vaccine. It could be a trypanosoma parasites several variants of which are lethal’ (the bold italic text is missing form original {PDF)
JANSSEN
- Shows an organic-inorganic aggregate (see below) identified in a Janssen “vaccine”. The particles are composed of stainless steel and are glued together with a “Carbon-based glue”. This aggregate is magnetic and can trigger biological problems inside the blood circulation due to possible interactions with other dipoles.
(EDITOR’S NOTE: PLEASE SIGN OUR PETITION CALLING FOR AN INVESTIGATION INTO VACCINE INDUCED MAGNETISM HERE: )
ASTRAZENECA
- An engineered aggregate of Iron-Chromium-Nickel (stainless steel) nanoparticles embedded identified in an Astrazeneca “vaccine”
ANALYSIS: XRF Instrumentation
ASTRAZENECA
- Histidine
- Sucrose,
- PEG (poly-ethylene glycol)
- Ethylene alcohol.
Only the presence of PEG is declared in the data sheet of this “vaccine”.
ANALYSIS: OPTICAL MICROSCOPE
PFIZER
These images were obtained using 100X and 600X optical microscopy (normal microscopes)
- On the left we see the images obtained from the Pfizer vaccine
- On the right we see a visual match from known sources.
Aqueous fraction image from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and from reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 100X
Aqueous fraction images from Pfizer vaccine sample (left) and sonicated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) standard (right) (Sigma-777684). Optical microscopy, 600X
ANALYSIS: ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
PFIZER
TEM microscope observation where particles of graphene in a Pfizer” vaccine” are present. The X-ray diffractometry reveals their nature of crystalline Carbon-based nanoparticles.
Aqueous fraction from ComirnatyTM sample. Electronic microscope (TEM), JEM-2100Plus, at 200 kV
ANALYSIS: SPECTROPHOTOMETER
PFIZER
The spectrum was compatible with the peak of rGO at 270nm.
Most of this absorbance might be due to graphene-like sheets, abundant in suspension in the sample.
This thesis was further supported by high fluorescence from the sample with maximum at 340 nm, in accordance with peak values for Graphene Oxide.
SUMMARY
The analyzed “vaccines” present components that are not mentioned in the technical data sheet and whose presence does not seem to have to do with the concept of vaccine.
Since they are not included in the documentation presented to the Governmental organizations (FDA, EMA, etc.) for the legal approval aimed at the commercialization and the human use, they seem to be a contamination probably due to the industrial process of manufacturing.
It seems that nobody controlled the final product before its distribution – that means that consumers are not informed of the real content of the products.
Possible side effects may be due to the injection of those contaminants into the body.
It must be observed that the components that are not declared but we identified are not biocompatible and some have also a mechanical impact once they are inside the blood circulation, especially in contact with the vascular endothelium.
The entities present in Pfizer and Astrazeneca “vaccines”, identified by the ESEM images, can represent a risk for the human body. They can be responsible of the formation of thrombi, since they are thrombogenic.
A further risk is represented by the extravasation of the particles with an ensuing possible hemorrhage. Once in the blood circulation, the particles can be carried also to the brain. In this case the patient can suffer from a stroke, and/or a cerebral hemorrhage.
If the damage of the endothelium caused by the particles occurs in the heart, there is a high probability of contracting a myocarditis. In addition to all that, the toxicity of graphene is well-known.
The presence of non-biocompatible organic-inorganic foreign bodies in the blood circulation can be responsible of a nano-bio-interaction that can induce severe health problems.
References Bano, I. et al , 2019. Exploring the fluorescence properties of reduced graphene oxide with tunable device performance,Diamond and Related Materials,Volume 94,59-64,ISSN 0925- 9635
Biroju, Ravi & Narayanan, Tharangattu & Vineesh, Thazhe Veettil. (2018). New advances in 2D electrochemistry—Catalysis and Sensing. 10.1201/9781315152042-7. Choucair, M., Thordarson, P. & Stride, J. Gram-scale production of graphene based on solvothermal synthesis and sonication. Nature Nanotech 4, 30–33 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.365
Kim et al, Seeing graphene-based sheets, Materials Today,Volume 13, Issue 3,2010,Pages 28- 38,ISSN 1369-7021
Xu et al, (2019) Identification of graphene oxide and its structural features in solvents by optical microscopy, RSC Adv., 9, 18559-18564
1-Extracction RNA Kit
https://www.fishersci.es/shop/products/ambion-purelink-rna-mini-kit- 7/10307963
2- NanoDropTM
3- QUBIT2.0:
*****
Categories: Uncategorized