The Concord Township Fire Levy is creating quite a stir in the community. LFC would like to offer both sides of the issue a forum to present their views. Those that are for the levy can send their article to firstname.lastname@example.org, and we will add it to this post for you.
Here are the arguments against the levy from the ‘Affordable Concord Taxes’ group:
We could be forced to pay more than $10 million in new taxes – plus millions in interest and other costs – because the Trustees are proposing an outrageously large and expensive fire station. In fact, this new facility would be four times bigger than the current fire station on Rt. 608.
You just have to do the math: These plans are more excessive, and some of the features seem overly costly, compared with fire stations in the area. Yet we have a similar number of fire and emergency calls each year.
We fully support our firefighters and EMS professionals. Of course we want a safe community and to see new stations built, but just not such excessive plans and with residents on the hook for decades of debt. There are better, alternative sources of funding that won’t raise our taxes.
Vote NO on Issue 1. Let’s make our elected officials act more prudent and fiscally responsible.
1. The Trustees previously stated that the continuous fire levy that was recently passed was to be used for fire apparatus and buildings.
2. New fire stations can be built over time with the funds from that levy and from JEDD funds without the need for another bond levy.
3. The officials have not been able to adequately justify why is there need for a 24,000 square foot facility.
Categories: Concord, Lake County Cities & Townships, Tax Levies, Uncategorized
76818 77092Admiring the time and effort you put into your web site and in depth info you offer. Its good to come across a blog every once in a while that isnt exactly the same out of date rehashed material. Fantastic read! Ive saved your site and Im including your RSS feeds to my Google account. 944436
255212 848728Basically received my 1st cavity. Rather devastating. I would like a super smile. Looking a whole lot much more choices. Numerous thanks for the write-up 905513
273012 459987I want reading through and I conceive this site got some really utilitarian stuff on it! . 304700
49714 259444A really informationrmative post and lots of really honest and forthright comments made! This surely got me thinking a lot about this problem so cheers a lot for dropping! 978667
52956 889479Hiya! Amazing weblog! I happen to be a everyday visitor to your web site (somewhat a lot more like addict ) of this website. Just wanted to say I appreciate your blogs and am seeking forward for far more! 409553
27611 137309Some times its a pain in the ass to read what men and women wrote but this internet website is really user friendly ! . 295256
We agree. The label “Fire Station” should really be “EMS Station” because the overwhelming majority of calls are EMS related.
The main mission of fire departments is EMS. My question is, what kind of value based programming is CFD doing to ensure that tax dollars are optimally utilized? I see no community Paramedic program or any other value based program as defined by national standards set forth for EMS systems at CFD. These program reduce costs to the local fire department and have shown to save millions based upon fire department size. Are they putting all their (actually our) eggs in one basket (more fire trucks) and less in what is the primary function of a fire department which is EMS?
My husband and I agree with your comment regarding the size of the station…..24,000 square foot is extremely large. Is this a fire station or a rec center.