W-E Schools…not nice to fool the public

We previously wrote about attending the recent Willoughby-Eastlake school board meeting.  https://lobbyistsforcitizens.com/2019/09/10/willoughby-eastlake-school-board-textbook-on-how-to-lose-touch-with-taxpayers/

During the meeting, Superintendent Steve Thompson and the Treasurer discussed the need for the 4.99 mill, additional, current expenses, CPT, levy commencing with the 2019 tax year.  Here is the Lake County Board of Election’s list of all issues that will be on the November ballot.  Please note that we have highlighted the Willoughby-Eastlake 4.99 mill levy.    November 2019 Ballot issues

Let’s make sure that everyone knows what they are reading:

  1. (49 Pcts) means that there are 49 precincts in the Willoughby-Eastlake school district that will be impacted by this levy.
  2. 4.99 Mills represents the outside millage that will be charged on the market values (appraised value) of the property in the district.
  3. “Additional” means that this is a new tax that will be paid by the taxpayers.
  4. Current expenses are the operating expenses needed to keep the doors open and cannot be used for payment of buildings and other capital improvements.
  5. CPT means “continuous period of time”- as we have said many times before this really means FOREVER.

Superintendent Steve Thompson and the school’s Treasurer gave a presentation explaining how the homeowners can calculate the tax owed, why they need a continuing levy, and what dire consequences will occur if the levy does not pass.  Unfortunately, the rules of order maintained by the controlling school board prevents any dialog during the presentation.  Although we were in attendance, we could not ask questions or refute what was being said during the meeting.  Basically, any input by the taxpayers challenging the school officials’ statements is the last thing the Superintendent and School Board wants.

Therefore, we will use this forum to inform the public and challenge the school officials.  We have no other alternative, since we are relatively sure that  the local newspaper will not touch this subject.

Calculating the New Tax:

The Treasurer presented a chart illustrating how much the new ‘additional’ tax will cost the taxpayers annually.  We have asked the Superintendent for a copy of the chart, and have tried to find it on-line, but we have not been successful.

The Treasurer’s explanation was so convoluted that he surely lost most of the audience.

His explanation: Market value of home $100,000
Assessed value %                     35%
Assessed value                   $35,000
Number of Mills                       4.99
Tax  Calculation            $35,000 x 4.99 / 1,000 = $174.65
Rollback Credit %                   12.5%
Net Tax After Rollback Credit   $152.81 per year ($174.65 x [100% – 12.5%])
He even used the silly argument that “it only cost $.41 per day”.  [$152.81 / 365]

We have two problems with his presentation:  (1) They are flat out WRONG and (2) It is far TOO CONFUSING.  We knew they were wrong during the meeting, but the recalcitrant school board does not want input from the taxpayers.

(1) Why are they wrong?  We confirmed our understanding of the rollback credits with the Lake County Auditor’s office and the State of Ohio Board of Equalization. (Side note – the BOE does the calculations for the H.B. 920 impact on tax levies)

you decide


The rollback credits no longer apply to new levies
, and an “Additional” levy is a new levy.  Therefore, Superintendent Thompson and the Treasurer either are ignorant of the law, incompetent, or guilty of deceiving the public.  We will let the voters decide.

(2) Why is it too confusing?  Here is the easy calculation that we learned from the ever helpful Auditor’s office and the highly competent Lake County Finance Director:

Multiply the number of mills (4.99) x $35.00 = $174.65 per $100,000 of market (appraised) value per year.  If your house is appraised at $200,000 you would multiply the $174.65 x 2 = $349.30.

If a political sub-division tries to pass a renewal levy with an increase, then the renewal portion would be subject to the rollback credit, but the increased tax portion would not be reduced by  the rollback credit.

If a political sub-division tries to pass a renewal levy, we would have to multiply the number of mills by the “effective tax rate”.  The House Bill 920 was intended to remove the impact of inflation on the value of your home, and therefore the concept of “effective tax rate” became the new reality.

you decide

Please remember that the school officials are supposed to be top flight educators.  One could rightly ask why these educators cannot do a better job of explaining property taxes to the taxpayers.  Again, we will let the voters decide what their motivation might be.

(3) Why the need for a continuing levy? Superintendent Thompson stated that the continuing levy will save the taxpayers money in the long run since the bond market wants to see a constant revenue stream, and the bond market is concerned about all of the W-E emergency levies.

This is a bit confusing to us because we cannot see why the bond market is involved in a levy for “current operating expenses”. The reason that the school officials have pushed so many emergency levies is to avoid the impact of H.B. 920.  Emergency levies guarantees them the fixed revenue that they want.

Superintendent Thompson did state unequivocally that public school expenses will ALWAYS increase and will never go down.  Think about that statement.  With decreasing enrollment. the cost to educate the children will continue to go up.  It is our opinion, that is one of the reasons we see the public schools increasing the services they provide, replacing the family’s influence, and trying to become the ‘hub’ of the community.

(4) What happens if this levy does not pass?  The standard cutbacks in schools services: busing, school athletics,  after school activities, etc, etc,etc. will occur.  We were waiting to hear that the administrators will have to take a cut in pay, or they will give up the “pickup” that they enjoy.  Of course, those cost cutting measures are never considered.

What is the “pickup”, you may ask?  School administrators are required to pay 14%, (some may be at 10%) toward their pension, and the employers pay 14%.  We now have the entire 28% paid by the employers for some employees.  So the employers “pick up” the employee’s portion of their pension.   NOT A BAD DEAL, EH?

We will write another article to show the Willoughby-Eastlake taxpayers how their ‘HOUSING AFFORDABILITY THRESHOLD %’ (HAT %) will be impacted by the 4.99 mill levy.

 

 

 



Categories: Lake County, Tax Levies, Uncategorized

Tags:

7 replies

  1. A very complete and informative explanation . I will be looking forward to learning more in the future. GET THE VOTE NO yard signs ready.

    Like

  2. Wow. Im truly blown away by how incapable this writer is at paying attention and listening in meetings. Go back to Concord, mate. Your opinion quite literally doesn’t matter.

    Like

  3. Anonymous: Must be a teacher or an employee of the system…

    Like

  4. You are obviously not for the children at all. No one likes to spend more money, myself included, however it’s just a fact of life. Yes I understand that enrollment may go down, bit the fact of the matter is funding streams have changed. You also brush by the importance of after school activities. I will say you do correctly identify yourself, you are a lobbyist, you are fighting for one side. I am not sure if you are a member of this community, but it does not sound like it. Everyone has their choice of which way they want to vote, so they must do their own research. Not voting for the levy may put money in your pocket each month, but it will cost you in the long run. If schools aren’t desirable people move away and new families dont move in and property values fall and cities die. That needs to be part of you equation. And look just to be clear, I am not a fan of how our school board does things or of our superintendent, but the only true way to have any affect on them is vote them out at THEIR reelection time. Failing the levy will not affect them

    Like

  5. Try living on S.S. and a meager pension with the skyrocketing costs just to get by! Not to mention in my case as a 2 time cancer survivor my huge health care bills!!!

    Like

    • Believe me, Lobbyists for Citizens understands the plight of many seniors. That is why we are trying to make the politicians aware of the looming crisis about to wash over the Lake County seniors. Only Commissioner John Hamercheck has ever spoken to us about trying to even address the problem. Commissioners Cirino and Young ignore our position on ANY issue that we bring to their attention. Please remember that when they run for any future elected office.

      We are trying to meet with our State Representative and State Senator to see what can be done to help seniors. However, be aware that there is the thinking by some seniors that they are offended by our offer to have the government help seniors. Our response is that they can decline any assistance if it is offered to them.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: