Riverside School District…part 1 of 2

clapping image

(LFC Comments:  We wanted to share with our readers the correspondence between LFC and the Lake County Riverside School District.  We would like to thank Mr. Gary Platko, Chief Financial Officer and Ms. Belinda Grassi, School Board Member, for their prompt, honest and transparent responses to our questions.  This is part 1 of 2 dealing with Riverside School District.)

Our email to Mr. Platko with a copy to Ms. Grassi:

Hello, Gary:
We are working on an article reviewing Riverside’s 5 year forecast. We found a lot of answers on-line, but need help understanding the account 1.060 All Other Operating Revenue.
In 2017, it was $3,954,237, but in 2024 it is projected to be on $2,174,864.  This is a reduction of $1,779,373 (45%).
Can you please tell us what is included in that account?
How does the renewal levy on the March ballot impact the 5 year projection?
How many students participate in the voucher program, what schools are they attending, and what is the cost to the Riverside school district
It is clear to us that the projected increases in local property taxes will be going to pay for wages and benefits, which are growing at an annual compound rate of 4.32%.  Seniors and many others in the community are not enjoying that level of increase in their annual income.
The seniors living on social security cannot afford any increases in property taxes, and the school funding is pricing them out of their homes.
Has the school board ever considered asking for an income tax to pay for the increasing wages and benefits?
Thank you,

Brian Massie

Lobbyists for Citizens
a 501 (c) (4) Non-Profit
Here is Mr. Platko’s response to LFC:

Hi Brian,

Here are the answers to your questions on the five year forecast.

Line 1.060 All Other Operating Revenue is made up of various line items including revenue from the Lake County School Financing District, open enrollment, pay to participate fees, classroom fees, interest, revenue from TIF agreements, Medicaid revenue, excess cost revenue, field trips, shared services, manufactured homes tax revenue, rentals, fines, donations, and other revenues.

The largest portion of this line item is revenue from the Lake County School Financing District, which is estimated at $2,053,495 for FY2020. Since this levy was not renewed by the voters on November 5, 2019 the forecast assumes the last year of collection will be calendar year 2020, which covers one half of fiscal year 2021. Therefore, revenue is projected at $1,006,213 for FY2021 and $0 for all future years.

If the levy is renewed on March 17, 2020, collection will begin in calendar year 2021 and the district will not experience any loss in revenue. The May 2020 forecast update will reflect the results from the March 17, 2020 election. I believe this answers your first two questions regarding the projected reduction and the impact of the renewal on the March ballot. Let me know if you need any additional clarification.

In regards to vouchers, there are three scholarship programs through the Ohio Department of Education named EdChoice Scholarship, Jon Peterman Special Needs Scholarship, and Autism Scholarship.

For the current fiscal year, we are not an EdChoice school so there is no cost to Riverside currently. As you know, we are on the list for next year and there is currently a debate in the legislature on making changes.

At this time, we are not certain how that will progress. The current forecast does not include any cost for EdChoice but will be updated in May once we know more. The cost of EdChoice could be significant.

Below is a screenshot that shows the cost of Jon Peterman and Autism along with the schools receiving funds from Riverside. Let me know if the screenshot doesn’t come through. More information regarding these programs can be found here: http://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Other-Resources/Scholarships
Scholarships for Riverside

Also, thank you to Belinda for the background on the previous consideration of an income tax levy. I know it was looked at in the past, but I did not have any background on the details.

If you have any additional questions, please let me know.

Thank you,

Gary A. Platko, CPA

Riverside Local School District


Belinda grassi

Belinda Grassi

Here is the thoughtful response from Ms. Belinda Grassi, Riverside School Board Vice-President:

Hi Brian – I’m going to let Gary answer your questions, but I thought I’d just add a few of my own personal thoughts on your questions for your consideration.

To be clear, and I’m sure you know, but schools are not the only beneficiaries of property taxes, and cannot be considered the sole culprit of “pricing seniors out of their homes”.  Lakeland, Metroparks, County government, Township expenses (because townships cannot legally assess income taxes so property taxes are higher – which pay for fire, police, etc that are normally paid for by city income taxes), Libraries, County Crime Lab, Seniors, Dept. of Developmental Disability, and others are funded by property taxes also.  I won’t expound on the validity of some of the tax requests we’ve seen lately for some of these agencies – you can be the judge of that.

However, keeping in mind that Lake County just raised sales taxes last year (or just prior to that) without a vote of the county residents, and Laketran just passed an additional county-wide sales tax for a 10 year period without a very good justification of how that would be spent.  In 10 years time, we’ll see that as a renewal I’m sure.  Costing every resident – even those with little income – more dollars every year.  Sales taxes are not progressive taxes, they tax consumer spending and those with little spending ability are hurt the worst in a sales tax scenario as those taxes take away more of what little available funds they have to purchase necessary commodities for daily living.

Social Security increases do not keep up with inflation to be sure – I think my husband saw his benefits increase by less than $100 a month this year, of which an additional $30 was taken back for increased Medicare cost.  I get it.  However, the 4.32% you see in the wages & benefits line of our 5 year forecast is attributable to rising health care costs as well as salaries – and the rise in benefit costs is growing at a much higher percentage year to year than wages are.  Gary can likely provide you with those individual breakdowns.  We all know how the cost of health benefits keeps rising.  And to be clear on that end, The State of Ohio Public Employee Retirement System for example just passed on a very large increase to the beneficiaries of their pension system.  So it’s not just Riverside experiencing increasing health care costs.  The entire county sees this as a very large issue of concern as I’m sure you are well aware.

As for an income tax, the topic was considered at length prior to Gary’s arrival at Riverside, maybe even before Tom’s election.  Back in the 2010-2012 period when we had to make drastic cuts to our budgets due to compounded circumstances – inefficiencies that have since been addressed (we’ve gotten so much smarter since then!), falling property values etc.  Considering that the largest block of “anti-tax” voters is also located in the community with the highest district wages, it was determined that an income tax levy would fail even more miserably than a property tax levy that would be proposed.

While I realize that an income tax shields seniors from rising property taxes, I also realize that wage earners vote and even an income tax of 1% levied on their earnings will cost them more than a property tax would – and would likely fail at even higher rates among those voter populations.  Considering that “taxes” in general are now a limited federal income tax deduction doesn’t help in either case.

I’d be willing to consider an income tax, but school income tax levies in general have largely been reserved throughout the state to compensate districts in areas where property value is low and agricultural property use is high.  Those districts don’t generate a wealth of property tax, and the law to allow school district income taxes was passed based on the assumption that those districts needed a way to generate funding when the only source of tax generation at the time was on property values.  That doesn’t mean we can’t consider one.  It just means that it would be exponentially harder to pass.  It also means that even low-wage earners who have no property wealth would also be taxed on their earnings.

In my view, it shifts the tax burden from the seniors to the low income earners, and that’s probably even less fair than our current structure.  And in many cases, the seniors have a better ability to pay than those current low-wage earners for many reasons too numerous to expound on here.

Anyway, that’s just my 2 cents added to whatever numerical and statistical data Gary can provide to you.

Thanks for listening, asking, and most of all being a taxpayer who is willing to be informed and get information before forming an opinion based on perception.  I appreciate that!


Riverside Local Schools Board of Education
(440) 487-1599


(LFC Comments:  Ms. Grassi is correct that in 2012 Lake County passed an increase in sales tax without a vote of the taxpayers.  We did some research on that in past articles.  sales tax increase 2012

Commissioner Dan Troy was “front and center” on that issue, but he did get the inside millage on the property tax reduced.  It did not completely offset the income generated by the sales tax, but at least Troy was cognizant of the plight of seniors with property taxes.

Regarding lower income earners, they do get the federal earned income credit the reduces and may eliminate their federal income taxes.  https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5334.pdf   )

Categories: Concord

Tags: ,

14 replies

  1. My brother suggested I might like this blog. He was entirely right. This post actually made my day. You can not imagine simply how much time I had spent for this info! Thanks!

  2. You have noted very interesting details ! ps decent internet site.

  3. I simply couldn’t go away your website prior to suggesting that I actually loved the standard info an individual supply on your visitors? Is gonna be back frequently in order to investigate cross-check new posts.

  4. very good submit, i certainly love this website, carry on it

  5. 899157 362769I real delighted to locate this website on bing, just what I was seeking for : D also bookmarked . 309922

  6. 343507 786869I wanted to say Appreciate providing these details, youre performing a great job with the internet site… 861613

  7. I really happy to find this site on bing, just what I was looking for : D as well saved to fav.

  8. 367693 383817I truly prize your piece of function, Great post. 206321

  9. Thanks – Enjoyed this post, can I set it up so I get an email whenever you publish a new article?

  10. Simply wanna input on few general things, The website design is perfect, the content is real good : D.

  11. After all, what a great site and informative posts, I will upload inbound link – bookmark this web site? Regards, Reader.

  12. 114170 811109Previously you ought to have highly effective internet business strategies get you started of getting into topics suitable for their web-based organization. educational 676551

  13. 264741 374361Why didnt I consider this? I hear exactly what youre saying and Im so happy that I came across your weblog. You really know what youre talking about, and you produced me feel like I need to learn a lot more about this. Thanks for this; Im officially a huge fan of your blog 939657

  14. 792116 47939Thanks – Enjoyed this post, can you make it so I receive an e-mail when you make a fresh post? From Online Shopping Greek 90223

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

%d bloggers like this: