A History on American Education System…it may shock you

free speech zone

(LFC Comments:   Here is another great article on the history of American educators and the American education system.  No doubt, this article will have current educators around the State of Ohio in a tizzy.  However, we are committed to getting the truth out to the people.  When schools continue to ask for more property taxes, citizens have the right to question their performance. Thanks to our Knox County contributor for sending this article to us.
You may want to bookmark the author Mr. Bruce Dietrick Price’s websitehttp://www.improve-education.org/)

Mr. Price also has a book that you may wish to consider adding to your personal library:  For more information on the book, see Lit4u.com/saving-k-12

Bruce Price


“Saving K-12 – What happened to our public schools? How do we fix them?”


Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bruce_Deitrick_Price

If you study American education during the past one hundred years, you will be continually overwhelmed by a feeling of bafflement. You may find yourself exclaiming, “This does not make any %@ sense!” These people call themselves “educators,” right? But they continually work to diminish education. How can they be educators when they sabotage and subvert education every chance they get?

It’s like meeting chefs who detest food and don’t believe in nutrition. Generals who can’t stand the sight of guns and want to disarm. Artists who despise color and harmony and design. You’ll struggle to find the best way to describe this counter intuitive spectacle: twilight zone, make-believe, charade, theatre, hallucinations induced by drugs, a tale told by an idiot. Finally, you’ll scream, once again, “What the %@ is going on?” 

Here’s the answer.

Around 1890 Education was a new field. Americans with a PhD in Education were few in number (probably only a few dozen) and united in ideology. They had the fervor of new converts–in their case, to Psychology and Socialism. Unilaterally, they executed one of the biggest bait-and-switch operations in history. They eased “Education” out of the knowledge business, and snuck it into the social engineering business. They weren’t asked to do this. No branch of government legislated the change. Nobody in the society wanted this except the conspirators themselves. So, from the outset, there was a startling, in-your-face arrogance (“We know the Truth! You don’t!” This arrogance is half the answer to our question.

As determined as these ideological adventurers were, and as confident of their own genius, they knew that America was not interested in the goods they had to sell. And thus we come to the second half of the answer: deceit and disingenuousness. (Secrecy, it might be said, corrupts, but absolute secrecy corrupts absolutely.) In short, our educators embraced early on the endless lying that has deformed American education for 100 years.

Think of someone leading a double life–a con artist come to steal your bank account or a pedophile befriending your child. The truth simply cannot be spoken. And so it was with the Fathers of Education. Starting around 1890, gathering force in 1900 and 1910 and 1920, energized by the Great Depression in 1930, they worked in stealth to transform the United States into a different country, populated by more cooperative, less individualistic people. Educators set about creating tomorrow’s simpler citizen by altering today’s child. They could do this by managing the public schools. To control the schools, they had to control the teachers and administrators, and to do that, they needed to dominate the education schools, such as Teachers College. As you see, this was an elaborate conspiracy, tirelessly pursued over decades.

Harold Rugg described the plan in a 1934 book, The Great Technology: “Through the schools of the world we shall disseminate a new conception of government–one that will embrace all the activities of men, one that will postulate the need of scientific control…in the interest of all people.” All the activities? Scientific control? Doesn’t that give one a nice chill? 1984 is dead ahead.

pulling back the curtain

I find that the most interesting history is intellectual history–the invisible ideas that drive visible events. Rarely is such history more weird, unexpected and fascinating than in American education. How could it not be when soaring arrogance merged with rampant dishonesty? What we had, as a half-dozen quotations will show, was educators conspiring against everything most people assumed they cared about–namely, academic content; country; and children.

CONTENT: For the seven centuries leading up to 1900, through the Renaissance and the Enlightenment, our smartest people sang the advantages–the joys–of learning, of knowledge, of understanding the world. Even the Communists demanded universal education. But John Dewey and colleagues said, Nah, all that stuff is overrated; in its place, we bring you ignorance; ignorance will be your salvation. (Ignorance, as Orwell would mockingly assert, is Strength.)

In a hundred places John Dewey said things like: “I believe, therefore, that the true center of correlation on the school subjects is not science, nor literature, nor history, nor geography, but the child’s own social activities….I believe that this gives the standard for the place of cooking, sewing, manual training, etc., in the school.”

Dewey also said: “The plea for the predominance of learning to read in early school life because of the great importance attaching to literature seems to me a perversion.” A perversion!

In 1911 G. Stanley Hall wrote: “The knowledge which illiterates acquire is probably a much larger proportion of it practical. Moreover, they escape much eyestrain and mental excitement, and, other things being equal, are probably more active and less sedentary. It is possible, despite the stigma our bepedagogued age puts upon this disability, for those who are under it not only to lead a useful, happy, virtuous life, but to be really well educated in many other ways.” (This evil quote explains why educators promoted Whole Word, a reading pedagogy that undermines literacy.)

In 1929 Edward Thorndike and Arthur Gates wrote: “Artificial exercises, like drills on phonetics, multiplication tables, and formal writing movements are used to a wasteful degree. Subjects such as arithmetic, language and history include content that is intrinsically of little value….That the typical school overemphasizes instruction in these formal, academic skills as a means of fostering intellectual resources…is a justifiable criticism.”

This sad irony continues today: educators saying that facts and learning are not something that most people need.

COUNTRY: John Dewey spoke of a coming society where everybody would be more “interdependent,” code for socialistic. He also advised: “Change must come gradually. To force it unduly would compromise its final success by favoring a violent reaction.”

The Depression made these conspirators more talky. Witness George Counts in 1932: “Historic capitalism, with its deification of the principle of selfishness, its reliance upon the forces of competition, its place of property above human rights, and its exaltation of the profit motive, will either have to be displaced altogether, or so radically changed in form and spirit that its identity will be completely lost.” 

Politically, our educators wanted less religion, less family influence, and less free enterprise. They wanted more socialism, more secularism, more world government, and they wanted to be the true rulers of that government.

CHILDREN: Education, a new field, was born, in the same test tube as another new field, Psychology. All the early people studied in both areas, circa 1890. Most of them studied in Germany and were influenced by George Wundt and a Germanic/Hegelian sensibility which exalts society and denies importance to the individual. To make things worse, all of the foregoing got mixed up with a love for psychoanalytic theory, conditioning techniques, and running rats through mazes. What the Psychologists did with rats, the Educators wanted to do with children.

Edward Thorndike summed up the mood in his 1906 book, The Principles of Teaching Based on Psychology: “The aim of the teacher is to produce desirable and prevent undesirable changes in human beings by producing and preventing certain responses.” 

pulling back the curtain

You’ve doubtless heard the phrase “cannon fodder,” for soldiers fed to the murderous fire of artillery. To a remarkable degree, children became ideology fodder. All of these early Psychologists and Educators had heads full of theories that basically regarded children as raw material to be turned into something else. Priority One was creating children who got along well in a group. Knowledge could make a child independent and hard to manipulate, so ignorance became a plus. The ed schools, the teachers, the educators, everyone was soon entangled in a conspiracy to make children mediocre. 

THE CRISIS CONTINUES: Education can be used for two opposite purposes, to liberate or to control. George Washington, Ben Franklin, all the other founding fathers, just assumed that education in America would be a tool for liberation. Should have been, could have been. Quite unexpectedly, quite mysteriously, our educators went the other way; their bizarre zigzag is the cause of the continuing crisis in education.

Why did these early educators go wrong? They believed Karl Marx? They studied in Germany and absorbed a Teutonic love of community and herd? They bought into a psychiatric vision which viewed children and rats in kindred terms? They wanted to be movers and shakers in a Brave New World? They were arrogant pipsqueaks? All of the above, that is my guess.

The first group of these neo-educators mentored the succeeding generation of educators to be exactly like themselves. As did the next, and the next. And so we moved forward toward the present, with our educational establishment incestuous and inbred, misshapen by inherited disorders, like a sickly clan marooned in some Faulkner Ian, fog-shrouded mountains. Thus in 1979 Gene Lyons could write in his bombshell article “Why Teachers Can’t Teach” that teacher education was “a mammoth and very expensive swindle of the public interest, a hoax, and an intellectual disgrace.” In 1983 a government panel issued the famous “Nation at Risk” report, which contained this wonderfully deadpan indictment: “If an unfriendly foreign power had attempted to impose on America the mediocre educational performance that exists today, we might well have viewed it as an act of war.” (I believe that was a cute way of saying: our educators ARE an unfriendly foreign power.) In 1990, Rita Kramer visited some of the best ed schools and wrote a book titled “Ed School Follies,” noting that what struck her most forcefully was how little the activities in these places had any connection to intellectual ideas or what the children would learn, but everything to do with “socialization.”

To justify ideas that don’t work and aren’t supposed to work, our educators have become a full-time Department of Disinformation. A million lies told about phonics would be one example (for more on this, Google my “Tribute to Rudolph Flesch”). But let’s just glance at the single most prevalent and destructive con of them all: In order to help the less smart, we need to stifle the more smart. What a weird no sequitur. Have you really helped the slow students by dumbing down the whole system? Is it so great to be kept wrapped in ignorance, and never challenged? Is it really better to live in a less intelligent society where the engineers can’t count and the doctors can’t heal? In fact, I suspect that it’s the less smart, the less well-off, the minorities and disadvantaged who are most grievously victimized by our educators. They say they care about the children. Yes, they care about keeping them ignorant and puttylike.

pulling back the curtain

IN CONCLUSION: If you’re a socialist or if for whatever reason you want our country weak, then you would have to feel deeply pleased with the job done by our educators. Otherwise, you cannot be pleased. Sadly, the crisis will probably continue until we systematically terminate each of the bad ideas put in place a century ago by a small gang of conspirators. First step: face the truth. Education in America’s public schools is often a twilight zone deliberately created. All we need, to take education to another level, is profound respect for each student’s talent and intelligence, and a genuine desire to help each student succeed as much as possible.


Bruce Deitrick Price is a novelist, artist, poet and education activist. He writes about culture, language and education for his site Improve-Education.org. (Readers of this article would enjoy “21: A Tribute to Rudolph Flesch” and “25: Phooey on John Dewey.”)

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Bruce_Deitrick_Price

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/466948


Categories: Free Speech Zone, Uncategorized

Tags: ,

32 replies

  1. 342586 820248You must take part in a contest for among the best blogs on the internet. I will suggest this internet site! 405855

  2. 40951 581802Some genuinely good and valuable information on this site , besides I feel the style contains fantastic functions. 826255

  3. You’ve made some really good points there. I checked on the web to learn more about the issue and found most individuals will go along with your views on this web site.

  4. The very next time I read a blog, I hope that it doesn’t fail me as much as this one. After all, Yes, it was my choice to read through, however I actually thought you would have something helpful to say. All I hear is a bunch of complaining about something that you can fix if you weren’t too busy seeking attention.

  5. This website really has all of the information I needed about this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

  6. Just about all of whatever you state happens to be astonishingly appropriate and that makes me wonder the reason why I hadn’t looked at this with this light before. This article truly did switch the light on for me personally as far as this particular topic goes. Nevertheless there is actually one issue I am not necessarily too comfy with and whilst I try to reconcile that with the central idea of the point, let me see exactly what the rest of your subscribers have to say.Very well done.

  7. I was wondering if you ever thought of changing the layout of your site? Its very well written; I love what youve got to say. But maybe you could a little more in the way of content so people could connect with it better. Youve got an awful lot of text for only having one or two pictures. Maybe you could space it out better?

  8. Most of what you mention happens to be astonishingly appropriate and it makes me ponder why I had not looked at this with this light before. This particular article really did switch the light on for me as far as this issue goes. Nonetheless at this time there is actually one issue I am not too comfy with so whilst I attempt to reconcile that with the core theme of the point, let me see just what all the rest of your visitors have to say.Nicely done.

  9. I wanted to thank you for this excellent read!! I certainly loved every bit of it. I’ve got you bookmarked to check out new things you post…

  10. Very good info. Lucky me I came across your site by chance (stumbleupon). I have bookmarked it for later!

  11. Good post. I learn something totally new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon every day. It’s always useful to read through content from other authors and use something from their websites.

  12. 186050 130075Some actually good stuff on this internet website , I enjoy it. 553180

  13. Way cool! Some extremely valid points! I appreciate you writing this article plus the rest of the website is also really good.

  14. 242000 795128Good read. I just passed this onto a buddy who was performing some research on that. He just bought me lunch since I found it for him! Thus let me rephrase: Thanx for lunch! 706265

  15. 886470 708026Properly, that is wonderful, but consider further options weve got here? Could you mind submitting an additional write-up relating to them also? Several thanks! 263122

  16. 747993 465199How much of an exclusive write-up, maintain on posting far better half 888340

  17. 825394 289314I was reading some of your content on this website and I conceive this internet website is really informative ! Keep on putting up. 432356

  18. 3180 168091Get started with wales ahead almost every planking. Ones wales truly are a compilation of huge planks 1 specific depth advisors undoubtedly could be the identical towards the entire hull planking nonetheless with even bigger density to successfully thrust outward beyond the planking. planking 688557

  19. 869148 79399Dead composed topic matter, thanks for info . 227750

  20. Memory problems, special conditions for problems and 3 hours.I used it for three years.

  21. I started a blanket blanket.

  22. Do not change good changes. The old style is very difficult.

  23. 117002 409574I saw but an additional thing concerning this on an additional blog. Youve naturally spent some time on this. Well done! 777116

  24. 410915 864047Beneficial information and superb style you got here! I want to thank you for sharing your ideas and putting the time into the stuff you publish! Wonderful work! 805979

  25. 187128 686146I adore reading and I conceive this web site got some genuinely utilitarian stuff on it! . 583132

  26. 943989 807712Some genuinely fantastic blog posts on this internet website , regards for contribution. 344267

  27. 852979 815735Hey. Really good internet site!! Man .. Excellent .. Fantastic .. Ill bookmark this web site and take the feeds alsoI am happy to locate so significantly valuable data here within the post. Thanks for sharing 343649

  28. In that case my friend, you and I are on the same fight. A well worded, constructed and intentioned response. I appreciated it. Viva la resistance!

  29. I almost never mention teachers. They have little power and are NOT the culprits. Sorry for the confusion..

    When I say “educators,” I mean the people at the top, professors of education at Harvard, life-long bureaucrats in the Department of Education, the NEA, foundations, universities, and many mysterious non-profits that hover around education. And let’s not forget the media, which carefully pretend not to notice problems in education that they should be explaining.

    There really does seem to be a vast army of people (usually ideologues) trying to make sure that education is less efficient each year. Even the leaders throughout our society rarely have any idea what is being done to the children in K-12, If people understood what is going on, there would be much greater resistance.

  30. Is that all we need? Well, you’ve fixed it haven’t you. How do you propose we do that exactly beyond respect for talents and sincere desires?

    Firstly, education was not a new field in 1890. That is an inaccurate way to start your supposedly factually based opinion piece here. As a reader, I don’t appreciate a false historical narrative.

    “If you are a socialist, or if for whatever reason you want our country weak” is a bit persuasive for a brief overview of educational history wouldn’t you say? Oh you Marxist devils you, Dewey. I’d take another gander at your reading material friend.

    Your educational history walk-thru is nice enough, limited and one-sided, but I’d recommend you take a looksee at the 19th century. I think you might find it helpful to compare 19th century education to 20th century before crying out that the history of the US public school system will shock your reader. The history prior to that, infused with religious zealotry, gender duality and hate-based ignorance would shock them far more I’d wager. Then, you can compare that to the rise of charter schools and the impacts of NCLB after you collect data, which you need more of.

    Then, I’d recommend you ask some questions. Like: Which would you say has wrought the greatest economic, and social advantages? The rise of Dewey like systems, or those prior? In what capacity, can I pragmatically change education in the 21st century for the better? (Since you clearly want to help the students I teach and want to see our tax dollars spent smartly). What lessons does the history of the US educational system have to teach us?

    Also, as an educator myself I find it disgusting that you make assumptions about my intentions, but proclaim yourself as someone who respects and supports students.

    My job is a little tougher than that, friend.

    I enjoyed your read. Thank you for posting.

  31. For the truth about what has been done purposefully to what was once the best education system in the world, study Charlotte Iserbyt’s work…The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America. http://deliberatedumbingdown.com/ddd/.

    Also check out John Taylor Gatto’s work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ogCc8ObiwQ

    What has been done is really nefarious! Parents should pull their precious little ones out of the Public Fool System right now! Home school, home school, home school…until the present education system has been restored to its former glory. We spend more money per kid in this country and they are so unprepared for life…they can barely make a decision without assistance. Solving problems…not happening without a meltdown in many cases. This is why there is so much chaos in the schools…and suicides. No one committed suicide when I was going to school…and we had bullies too. So sad!

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: